Machiavellianism is, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, "the
employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct",
deriving from the Italian Renaissance diplomat and writer Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote Il Principe
(The Prince) and other works. "Machiavellian" (and variants)
as a word became very popular in the late 16th century in English, though
"Machiavellianism" itself is first cited by the OED from 1626. The
word has a similar use in modern psychology.
In
political thought
In the 16th century, immediately
following the publication of the Prince, Machiavellianism was seen as a foreign
plague infecting northern European politics, originating in Italy , and having first infected France . It was
in this context that the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre of
1572 in Paris came to be seen as a product of Machiavellianism, a view greatly
influenced by the Huguenot Innocent Gentillet, who published his Discours
contre Machievel in 1576, which was printed in ten editions in three
languages over the next four years. Gentillet held, quite wrongly according to
Sydney Anglo, that Machiavelli's "books [were] held most dear and precious
by our Italian and Italionized [sic] courtiers" in France (in the words of
his first English translation), and so (in Anglo's paraphrase) "at the
root of France's present degradation, which has culminated not only in the St
Bartholemew massacre but the glee of its perverted admirers". In fact
there is little trace of Machiavelli in French writings before the massacre,
and not very much after, until Gentillet's own book, but this concept was
seized upon by many contemporaries, and played a crucial part in setting the
long-lasting popular concept of Machiavellianism.
The English playwright Christopher Marlowe was an enthusiastic
proponent of this view. In The
Jew of Malta (1589–90) "Machievel" in person speaks the
Prologue, claiming not to be dead, but to have possessed the soul of (the Duke
of) Guise, "And, now the Guise is dead, is come from France/ To view this
land, and frolic with his friends" (Prologue, lines 3–4) His last play, The Massacre at Paris (1593) takes the
massacre, and the following years, as its subject, with the Duke of Guise and Catherine de' Medici both depicted as
Machiavellian plotters, bent on evil from the start.
The Anti-Machiavel
is an 18th century essay by Frederick the Great, King
of Prussia
and patron of Voltaire,
rebutting The Prince, and Machiavellianism. It was first published in
September 1740, a few months after Frederick
became king, and is one of many such works.
In
psychology
Machiavellianism is also a term
that some social and personality psychologists
use to describe a person's tendency to deceive and manipulate other people for their
personal gain. In the 1960s, Richard Christie and Florence L. Geis developed a
test for measuring a person's level of Machiavellianism. This eventually became
the MACH-IV test, a twenty-statement personality survey that is now the
standard self-assessment tool of Machiavellianism. People scoring above 60 out
of 100 on the MACH-IV are considered high Machs; that is, they endorsed
statements such as, "Never tell anyone the real reason you did something
unless it is useful to do so," (No. 1) but not ones like, "Most
people are basically good and kind" (No. 4). People scoring below 60 out
of 100 on the MACH-IV are considered low Machs; they tend to believe,
"There is no excuse for lying to someone else," (No. 7) and,
"Most people who get ahead in the world lead clean, moral lives" (No.
11). Christie, Geis, and Geis's graduate assistant David Berger went on to perform
a series of studies that provided experimental verification for the notion of
Machiavellianism.
Machiavellianism is one of the
three personality traits referred to as the dark triad,
along with narcissism
and psychopathy.
Some psychologists consider Machiavellianism to be essentially a subclinical
form of psychopathy, although recent research suggests that while
Machiavellianism and psychopathy overlap, they are distinct personality
constructs.
In 2002, the Machiavellianism
scale of Christie and Geis was applied by behavioral game theorists Anna
Gunnthorsdottir, Kevin McCabe and Vernon
L. Smith.
in their search for explanations for the spread of observed behavior in
experimental games, in particular individual choices which do not correspond to
assumptions of material self-interest captured by the standard Nash
equilibrium prediction. It was found that in a trust game, those
with high MACH-IV scores tended to follow homo
economicus' equilibrium strategies while those with low MACH-IV scores
tended to deviate from the equilibrium, and instead made choices that reflected
widely accepted moral standards and social preferences.
Machiavellianism has been found
to be negatively correlated with the Agreeableness (r = -.47) and
Conscientiousness (r = -.34) dimensions of the Big Five personality model
(NEO-PI-R).
Relationship
to Moral Judgments
A study on 17 social and economic
issues found Machiavellianism to correlate significantly with traditionally
"conservative" positions on capital punishment, free markets, and
detention of suspected terrorists without trial. No significant correlations
were found between Machiavellianism and traditionally liberal judgments.
The same study also found a significant correlation between Machiavellianism
and the judgment that it is good or right to tell a lie for the greater good,
and between Machiavellianism and utilitarian judgments in the trolley
problem cases.
0 comments:
Post a Comment